Welcome to Pohl Vault, a collection of reflections on being a middle school language arts & social studies teacher.

March 22, 2014

Reflections on Revision in the Poetry Unit

Big sigh. We have come to the end of our two-month-long poetry unit (first month- reading, second month- writing). I don't know why, but the poetry unit seems to fit so well into the third quarter of school. There is a lot of tough stuff to dig into (assonance, consonance, figurative language, symbolism, allusion), with an overall sense of playfulness and rule-breaking. Students are comfortable with each other in the class and with me, so are willing to write poems from their hearts. As eighth graders, the world of Shel Silverstein is left behind while they tackle extended metaphors by Langston Hughes and Longfellow, the cryptic language of e. e. cummings, and the sound devices of Poe. This mix of challenging curriculum within the context of short accessible texts and manageable writing expectations lifts the confidence and skill of nearly every student in my room.

Students submit two poetry anthologies as their assessments during the unit: a reading anthology of poems they analyze for meaning and music, and a writing anthology of their own poems, two of which are analyzed for meaning and music. Each anthology finishes with a closing statement reflecting on their learning. I learn so much about students from the closing statements: their process, their thinking, their discoveries, and their attitude. As I read closing statements from the writing anthologies yesterday, I was struck by how many students mentioned the value of revising and how the hard work of revision paid off in much better poems. Here is a sampling from the fifteen I read yesterday (names withheld to protect anonymity):
"One of the most important things I learned was that my first draft will never be my final product. After I had written my poem, I initially found it hard to edit and revise because in my mind I felt that my poem was good just the way it was. When I started revising, I was able to make my poems much better"
"I wrote lots of poems this unit, but I only chose a couple to revise and make worth reading. There were lots of different ways I chose to revise. For example one way was to completely scrap the poem and start from the beginning, but still write about the same idea. Another way I revised was to change the line breaks to add or take away emphasis to words. When I was writing poems, I took a lot of time just picking the right words to fit into each line."
"Throughout this unit, one of the biggest things I learnt was that revising will do marvelous things for my poems! Before this unit, I was very lazy and closed minded about revising poems. After I learnt new ways to revise and tried them, I realized that a poem can turn into exactly what I imagined after revising!" 
"The revising process for writing poetry is pretty hard, but once you revise you will get a feeling of accomplishment that you don’t get very much. A good tip of advice would be that not all poems make it through, some poems are not going to work as well as others and some will not satisfy you. I threw away 17 poems because I spent so much time revising them and they didn’t convey the message I was hoping to have them convey. Poetry is hard, but if you write enough you will discover that some topic work better with you than others, and that is when you write a great poem."
"One thing that I think was very cool that I did during this unit, was transforming a first draft I wrote into something completely different and new. My poem: ‘Eyes’, originally was a mentor poem that had a completely different meaning, about how much I liked and also hated blank pages. After some major editing, that simple poem turned into a symbolic poem about life."
"Sometimes, it was hard for me to actually bring myself to go back and edit my poems because I generally thought they were good as they were. By going back on my poems I learnt that revision is really important because even the small changes such as different punctuation and word choice can make a big difference. I also went back and made other changes such as trying to add in different poetic devices, and creating line breaks so change the flow of the poem itself. Doing those sorts of edits really helped me enhance my poems."
"It took a while to come up with these ideas. They all started as mere ideas that had only a bit of potential to be bigger and better poems. Revising them was hard, as at first they seemed like regular poems that couldn’t be changed to make better. Later on, it became clear that they had to be changed. So I worked harder on these poems compared to most of my other poems and they ended up as some of my best work. I learned a lot from this. I realized it’s hard to edit poems to make them a lot better than before. When you first write a poem, you feel like it’s the best that it could ever be, and that you can’t really change it to make it better. After learning multiple techniques of revising poems, it became a lot easier to revise them, as you become more educated in using strategies to change. The longer and harder a poem is worked on, the better it becomes and the more it changes into becoming a better poem." 
I know! I was actually as stunned as you are at the willingness eighth graders had toward revising their poems. Only writers who are committed to their ideas will work that hard to make their writing as good as it can be. This is the first time all year I have seen that kind of commitment, and maybe the only time I'll see it. Poetry is a special genre, and has great power for middle school students. 

I need to end this with a quote from one of my most reluctant (male) writers, a boy with the typical "school sucks" eighth grade attitude, who scoffed at every "try-it" poetry generating idea, who covered his paper as I walked by:
"I have learned that poetry is within everyone and everyone gets something out of it. Like me. I get to write the truth and I get to get happiness out of it. I think that everyone would be more happy if they wrote poetry more in their life and realize what life really is and how wonderful life is just with a little poetry." 

March 8, 2014

The Internet: Death of Personal Creativity or Learning Scaffold?

I have had a lot of conversations this week about plagiarism. They came on the heels of grading poetry reading anthologies; some students decided they needed some help interpreting poems, so they turned to the undisputed font of all wisdom-- the internet.

I believe they did this because they didn't trust their own interpretations. I had already seen the preparation work they had done, on paper, by themselves, with the poems. We had had conversations around their interpretations, and I had helped them tease out some of the more obscure or abstract lines. However, when they went to write up their notes into paragraphs describing meaning and musical devices, they got a little digital help (and didn't think about citing their source).

I am finding this to be a growing habit with my 8th graders. We became a 1:1 laptop school this year, so their devices are with them at all times in all classes. There are many advantages to this, and I am a big supporter of the change. But I do see behavior changing as a result.

It's not just this "borrowing" of ideas from others without crediting that I'm seeing. I've seen this before in previous years. My concern is the growing trend for my students to not trust their own thinking unless they get it confirmed by something on the internet.

Here's another recent example. In Social Studies, I put them in "Tavern Groups" during our Road to Revolution role play activity. I asked them to think of a name for their tavern and to draw a logo for their sign. I gave them a list of historical tavern names to choose from or to pattern their own original name. This part went well. When it was time to draw the logo, however, the laptop screens were flipped open.

"What are you doing? There weren't computers in 1765! What do you need your computer for?"
"I just need to see what an eagle (or a horse or a turtle) looks like!"

These children are 14 years old! They know what an eagle (or a horse or a turtle) looks like. However, they didn't trust that they could draw a familiar animal without seeing a digital image first (and no, they didn't ask if I had any animal books with pictures they could look at. If they had, I might have allowed it).

Is the internet the death of personal creativity and originality? Is creativity being re-defined as borrowing bits and pieces from other sources and putting them together into something new which is then claimed by the author as theirs? I see the .gifs on Tumblr or other sites that do just that. I watch the song or movie parodies on YouTube when my daughter shows me something she finds clever or witty. I have read the fan fiction she writes. None of these "new" products are completely original.

Or are these the scaffolds that budding artists and authors and thinkers need before they can launch their own original works? Certainly creating a piece based on a model is the foundation of the learning process in art and writing. Is it so bad that the model is an internet-based work?

At some point, however, we want our students to leave the models behind and find their own creative voices. That will take confidence and a spirit of risk-taking.

I guess my questions come down to these: How do we help our students break away from the scaffold so they can take that leap of faith into original works? and How can we ensure that they are ethical "borrowers" along the way?

March 1, 2014

Matching Data, Kids, and Books

My professional goal this year is to set up my classroom library as a teaching tool to support students into reading more complex texts. I have already done some work on this (and blogged about it): completed inventory with guided reading/lexile levels indicated when available, book ladders developed in several genres based on TCRWP lists, and a home reading expectation with regular accountability check-ins. A couple weeks ago I took the next step.

I was home for a sick day, one of those days where you're not all that sick, but you know going into school would be a very bad idea. I decided I would use my long quiet day to do some work with my new book ladders. I had three data points to work with: January MAP Reading data (especially suggested Lexile range), January reading log via Shelfari (www.shelfari.com) which allowed me to identify the book(s) students read during the month, and my knowledge of the kids at this point in the year.

After I captured the MAP data and the Shelfari books, I took a look at my book ladders to make a suggestion for a next book to read. This is where my knowledge of the kids came in. 

image from goodreads.com
I noticed one student who scored relatively low on the MAP was reading books like From the Mixed Up Files of Mrs. Basil E. Frankweiler (Level S, Lexile 700) and Charlotte's Web (Lexile 680). His MAP score suggested he should read books in the 897-1040 range. It seemed to me that he was a kid who is not very confident in his reading, and is relying on books he'd read in the past, or felt comfortable to him. If I look purely at the Lexiles of these books, I notice he's actually not too far off of his recommended range (at the lower end). So putting books in his hand that are not a huge jump up in complexity (to maintain the comfort level), but that are more 8th grade appropriate, seemed the way to go. Since From the Mixed Up Files is a mystery, I thought he might like to keep going with that genre. I suggested he read Silent to the Bone (also by E. L. Konigsburg), which is Level V, Lexile 810. This gives him a jump up in level and maturity of text, but keeps him with a familiar author and genre. 

image from paperbackswap.com
On the other end of the spectrum, I noticed one of my best readers had been reading Scorpia Rising (Lexile 780), and I Am Zlatan Ibrahimovic (unrated). His MAP suggested he read books in the 1275-1425 range. My knowledge of this boy along with this data tells me that he is a huge soccer fan, reads nonfiction as well as fiction, is interested in current events because we had a long conversation about Nelson Mandela's recent death, and would prefer to do other more active things than read. My suggestion for him was Nelson Mandela's biography No Easy Walk to Freedom (X/990). Although the guided reading level is low for him, the Lexile gets him closer to his suggested range. I also know that he is not going to independently read something that is at his suggested high Lexile level, usually either classic texts or primary source documents. He needs something interesting or he'll put it down in a hurry.

I did this for each student, and sent each of them an email with my suggestion. A few wrote back and said they'd already read it. Others thanked me and said they'd been looking for something new to read. And for the next few days, books were flying out of my classroom library.

Granted, this process took me several hours. I don't have the time to do this every month. However, if I can keep some of my lower kids reading (priority #1) more complex books (priority #2), this should support their progress across the year. In addition, if I can help my higher level kids read books they find interesting AND challenging (most books at the 8th grade level are around the 700-800 lexile level), their more advanced reading skills can be challenged as well.